Search for: "Adams v. Department of Children and Families, Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am by Graeme Hall
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) (20 May 2011): Forced relocation of terrorist suspect from London to Rochdale under control order was lawful, but Home Office must pay travel costs for family visits. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court has announced judgments of the following will be handed down on Wednesday 30 March next week: - Jones v Kaney, heard 11 – 12 January 2011 (here is our case preview); and - Duncombe and Others v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, heard 17-18 January 2011 (here is our case preview). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm by Melina Padron
Immigration law matters The Free Movement blog posted a short commentary on one specific aspect in the case of NA (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department : Section 55 of the Borders Act 2009 and enforcement measures concerning children. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Low reimbursement rates for home care, waiting lists for family support and other community-based services and Medicaid prior authorizations practices challenge families as they try to access supports and services for their children. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled a class-action lawsuit against TikTok concerning children’s privacy violations can proceed, SMO v TikTok Inc. and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Castle & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 2317 (Admin) (07 September 2011) ??? [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:56 am by Michael Ascher
  People who are subject to “CARI checks include childcare center employees, resource parenting applicants, kinship legal guardians, registered family childcare providers, provision of approved homes, professional guardians for the elderly, persons assuming care for children of incarcerated parents, adoption agency employees, court-appointed special advocate (CASA) volunteers, adoptive parent applicant, Department of Children and Family… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:56 am by Michael Ascher
  People who are subject to “CARI checks include childcare center employees, resource parenting applicants, kinship legal guardians, registered family childcare providers, provision of approved homes, professional guardians for the elderly, persons assuming care for children of incarcerated parents, adoption agency employees, court-appointed special advocate (CASA) volunteers, adoptive parent applicant, Department of Children and Family… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:56 am by Michael Ascher
  People who are subject to “CARI checks include childcare center employees, resource parenting applicants, kinship legal guardians, registered family childcare providers, provision of approved homes, professional guardians for the elderly, persons assuming care for children of incarcerated parents, adoption agency employees, court-appointed special advocate (CASA) volunteers, adoptive parent applicant, Department of Children and Family… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Department of Health, R (on the application of) v Information Commissioner [2011] EWHC 1430 (Admin) (20 April 2011): Department of Health must disclose late term abortion statistics under freedom of information law, rules High Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 WL Congo 1 and 2 & anr v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard… [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection A former 111 call centre advisor has been found guilty and fined for illegally accessing the medical records of a child and his family. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
AJ (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1191 (27 July 2011… Court of Appeal dismisses 3 joined asylum appeals: welfare of children was sufficiently taken into account. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]